The Future for HBU is so Bright I need Shades

by John Mark Reynolds on May 8, 2012

The Coming Educational Revolution

 

Since World War II, American colleges have performed two functions. We have civilized men and women for leadership and we have done job training. Sadly, for a variety of reasons American colleges are not giving value for money at either task.

 

We are failing the republic.

The cost of higher eduction has increased, but the quality has not increased.

Students are paying more for, at best, the same product.

Fortunately for us all, technology and an end to debt financing is about the end the present system. Change is coming and it will benefit parents and students, if it does harm those in the present system afraid of change.

I am excited about these changes, because at a school like HBU they represent a chance to change the old order. We don’t have to play catch up anymore . . . most schools are Kodak and we are digital.

Here are five changes I think are coming in the next five years to higher education:

First, higher education will take place locally for at least one year. Canada is right about more than hockey: year thirteen of high school is a good idea. Eighteen is no longer the start of adulthood in our culture, just as prom is not the night that most couples get engaged. Schools like HBU will push year thirteen into the local schools and eighteen year olds will be able to save money by staying home and studying in high school.

Second, if it is information it will be free and on-line. You cannot charge, much, for information in this new world. Schools will charge for person-to-person mentoring. In short, we will return to the university of the MIddle Ages where education was about the professor and the student, not the school. The name of the school will be less important than the personal attention you got from your professor.

Third, students wanting a union card will go to on-line schools and get what they want. Students that want to educate the whole soul will still sit with a teacher, the way Plato sat with Socrates or Mary sat with Jesus, and change.

Fourth, debt financing must be radically reduced or end. College should be affordable to middle-class parents. This can either be done by socialism, government control of education, which will ruin it or by allowing the market to work. Schools will stop charging for some things, trim administration, and lower the cost to students.

Fifth, a course of study in college should lead either to a job or a measurable increase in  virtue. Schools like HBU with a Christian worldview will have an advantage: we know what a lady or gentleman should be. Government colleges, like the post office, are remnants of another time. Majors must justify themselves on way or the other. The good news for HBU is that while Christian colleges will consolidate, our urban market and unique ideological flair will make us one of the survivors and thrivers.

The revolution that is coming will leave schools that are flexible in a good position. HBU will pass the state dinosaurs and help create the future. Schools will merger close. Those that are not nimble will die. HBU?

By the grace of God, we are about to be part of changing the educational world.

 

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Linkedin Plusone Email

Judge god.

by John Mark Reynolds on May 7, 2012

Calvin is a great thinker.

I am not.

Let’s start with those two assumptions.

Still a reading (in English, see the second assumption) of Calvin’s Institutes leaves me wondering. Often it appears Calvin defends his views by saying we cannot judge God.

True.

If confronted by God, the God who is all good, all powerful, all wise, and all knowing, the only response is worship.

Calvin’s Institutes is must reading for any serious Christian. Star Trek V isn’t must viewing for anyone, but the most hardcore fan, but there is one scene in it that made me wonder about Calvin. James T. Kirk, captain of the Enterprise, is confronted with “God” who asks for his starship.

“What,” Kirk asks, “does God want with a starship?”

This is a fair question and the only response Kirk gets is some smiting.

Calvin is right if we know the being claiming to be God is God, but not all such beings are who they say they are. Kirk faced such a problem. The god who demanded God status wasn’t and Kirk judged him wanting.

Kirk was right to do so.

Calvin lived in a world where Muslims, Jews, pagans, and different Christian sects claimed to know God. Face with contradictory claims, a man has to choose. They legend is that the Russians picked the God who would allow them to drink, but there should be a better basis for decision making.

I reject Baal’s claim to be god, because his nature is more like a devil than God.

I judge Baal no God and Calvin would approve.

Calvin presents a God who wills the Fall of mankind into sin and who condemns some eternally Hell through to choice of their own. They are born damned whatever they do. Such a god strikes many as no God, but a devil.

Calvin cannot then urge us not to “judge God,” because the critic is not doing so. The critic is judging that Calvin’s god isn’t God, not judging God. No man can judge God, but everyone must judge gods.

Of course, I must have misunderstood Calvin, he surely is too subtle for such an error, but I have heard lesser men make this mistake.

God forbid I fail to judge the gods.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Linkedin Plusone Email

Bauerlein on “Resonance”

by Micah Mattix on May 7, 2012

Over at First Thoughts, I have a short post on Mark Bauerlein’s piece on liberalism and literature at Public Discourse. His conclusion that “resonance” or personal fulfillment has replaced truth as the arbiter of value today is worth pondering.

Bauerlein discusses only the novel, but I wonder to what extent the importance of fulfillment–however short-lived–has perverted our view of service in the church or our view of vocation. No doubt we long to be involved in a community or to pursue a vocation that is fulfilling, but this shouldn’t be the only thing, and certainly not the most important thing, that determines which community we join or which vocation we pursue. And often the most fulfilling things turn out to be those we do out of a sense of duty to the one true God.

This, I take it, is part of what it means to lose one’s life to save it.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Linkedin Plusone Email

Avengers: Soulless Fun

by John Mark Reynolds on May 7, 2012

Avengers is a great comic book movie, but nothing more.

That is no insult from me, because I enjoy comic books movies the way I enjoy Edgar Rice Burroughs novels: quickly, but without remembering much about them.

There are moments of Avengers that makes me laugh out loud, shout, and shudder and for Whedon fans the news is good: it is more television Firefly than Serenity Whedon. The self-indulgent Whedon of Dollhouse, working out his hangups is mostly gone, and the Whedon of Buffy, willing to listen to writers, is on full display.

This is, I repeat, a great comic book movie and it will have its monetary reward.

But it could have been more, almost was, and is not.

At moments, Avengers echoes Lord of the Rings. I do not mean the “Legolas” reference, though that proves it was on the mind, but the start which reminds one of Peter Jackson in Fellowship and the all but Elvish council of super heroes in the film.

Avengers was great fun, but it lacked a moral center. When Americans bowed to Loki, I wondered, “Where are the Christians?” Millions of Russians died rather than bow to false gods, but Whedon has all but one New Yorker bow to Loki. I loved the New Yorker who stood up, but evidently is was only memory of heroism that provoked this old man to stand.

World War II haunts the film. It is as if it is the one moral certainty in a better time: Nazis are bad. Why are they bad? It is not certain in the film, but it has to do with control, boasting, and posturing. What is missing . . . in every character but Captain America is a compelling moral vision. We know New York is in danger and don’t like it, but don’t know why other than prejudice against monsters that we should dislike our fate.

What is at risk? Liberty? Truth? Justice? The American Way?

That would be old-fashioned and despite bows in that direction, there is no defense of the old comic book platitudes.

It is, perhaps, very sad that old Stan Lee comics from decades ago have a stronger moral center than a blockbuster film.

There is nothing to offend in Avengers, but nothing to cheer beyond “winning.” The alternate ending, where the heroes all eat together, battered, silent, is perfect Whedon: funny and a bit morally impotent. Avengers is not immoral, but it lacks a coherent morality.

And that is where a film that might have been great, as great as Lord of the Rings, does not transcend the genre. There simply is not a cause greater than the war. The corruption of all sides stinks through the film . . . Loki is not much less likable than the shadowy global government . . . and average New Yorkers are more fodder than folk.

One ends up caring more for the survival of the Empire State Building than any given citizen.

Go see Avengers, I will twice, but I cannot help but mourn the missing moral vision. I am a Christian, but it need not have been a Christian vision to have been a coherent movie or one with more depth. The heroes needed something beneath their suits.

It is for that reason that I wonder if Captain America will not endure longer . . . even if it made less money.

Joss Whedon has made a beautiful, paper mache movie, but the moment I left the film life began to batter at it and it fell apart, but no candy was inside . . . only an advertisement for a sequel.

 

 

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Linkedin Plusone Email

Ten Reasons We Are Moving To Houston and You Should Too

by John Mark Reynolds on May 5, 2012

We are, of course, moving to Houston for the chance to serve with Robert Sloan and see the “ten pillars” move from idea to . . . concrete reality. There will be a time, around June 25, where I take these ideas with the seriousness they deserve, but this is not that day. Today I will convince you that the Ten Pillars as adopted by Houston Baptist could only take place in Houston, Texas.

I say this with no prejudice as a son of West Virginia, educated in New York, and a resident of California. I say it, because it is true.

Here are the Ten Pillars and why they could only be implemented in Houston, Texas.

[click to continue…]

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Linkedin Plusone Email

Learning from Movies

by John Mark Reynolds on May 3, 2012

Movies are one of my favorite forms of entertainment. When in despair sitting in a movie theater with a Diet Coke is a cheap form of therapy, but movies are more than fun and therapeutic: they are educational.

Movies showed me my poor understanding of physics: explosions would not rip me up but push me forward. Phasers make noise in space and Spock could do many things without his brain.

It was one thing for Mr. DeMint to claim these things were false in science class: I saw them with my own eyes.

When thinking about religion and education, I have learned five basic truths from film that also contradict my reading and experience. However difficult, my goal is to overcome my prejudice toward experience and academic work and embrace what Hollywood has shown me.

[click to continue…]

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Linkedin Plusone Email